Architecture
Across Aliud, construction and infrastructure varies in styles and chronological basis. Many buildings are older in appearance, while others are more recent in framework.
In each continental region, the styles appear to vary in functionality and aesthetic, the historic focus on trade and terrain per locality a factor in how many or most buildings are constructed.
Structures historically located near oceanic or other water sources often comprise of stone and other material that would more easily weather salt and sea. In contrast, structures located in forest or field often incorporate wood, if not stone.
Metallic elements can be a factor as well, if more typical where trade and quarries allowed surplus of metals. As not every sapient species can withstand metal, this is oft something of consideration further.
Regardless of distribution, a 1600s to 1800s constructional diversity is present.
A blend of styles can be considered relevant to architecture. Centres of local tradition more heavily feature a specific historical aesthetic, although migrants from other locations have brought different perspectives, which are at times implemented.
The historical necessities that specific cultures involved affect what architectural style is used.
In Ereba, there is a focus on aesthetic and stonework in many locations. Railings, facades, gables, and brackets are frequent to buildings. Endurance and uniformity is central. In comparison, functionality and aesthetic is relevant to other locations.
Locations such as Alkebulan, Meluhha, Abiayala, and Mayab feature structures which conform to the landscape, but which also allow convenience and individuality for populaces. Stonework is frequent, being a common material. The exact materials used depend on local and transported resources, which creates diversity on a relative scale.
Depending on local cultures, buildings may be singular in purpose or based in the concept of apartments, meant to reduce space for other purposes. In Caral, Mayab, Meluhha, and Assuwa, this is often the case.
The maintenance of older buildings is a focus in many locations. Where newer buildings are prevalent, land was cleared to make room for advancements in population and technology.
As archaic methods still function in preventing complications, multiple towns and cities feature walls around their borders. Others lack that defense, preferring to keep with weather patterns.
The terrain and infrastructure overall appears to define relevant decisions, architectural practices having a degree of purpose grounded both in practicality and tradition.