Table of Contents
Use of Hawthorn in Europe
Both vestments almost exactly like Lilium's attire (which occur from their feathers, that are also part of themselves until detaching.)
Immaterial > material.
Catholicism was not a choice, Protestantism was. The difference in thought was an upheaval that did not happen without recognition.
The pope (and a successor) indirectly killed many persons in order to instill fear. It did not work.
Opposition is a natural response.
As opposed to (notably) Nordic ranges (medieval and earlier timeframes involved constant death), where the two raven Muninn and Huginn were relevant, aside from other harsh terrains: it was a massacre essentially.
Other thematics:
No skin/defining aspects: memory is universal.
Linen was a highly used cloth historically, in many places.
White was one shade related to mourning; aside from related to people of learning often. Linen is tawny unless bleached. White linen can be expensive depending on the location, historically.
Raven were "believed to be the souls of the dead"; coherency was realistically spooky; and it "would not make sense" for individuals to know things that people who passed did, otherwise.
Content warning
That is not everything relevant to their design: nondescription, capability, and other aspects present.
There was a functional purpose to why plague physicians were visually 'creepy'.
The outfit was meant to be scary.
It was not a new concept (at the time; 1619), and correlations exist by extent.
There is no direct connection, but regardless a parallel.
That is what they (and others) (partly) do functionally: reduce chance of things occurring ambiently.
Being able to cut through flesh adeptly, and know where to cut, is significant: there is (rarely utilised) capability to address complications improvisationally, and potentially kill things that would otherwise be a danger to others.
Medicine is multi-sided; it can be beneficial or harmful, depending on intended purpose.
Content warning