Tais

History

Where she came from is unclear.

Appeared at some duration. The consistency to appearances was not something indefinitely unapparent, more when presence preceded injuries and other complications.

In having appeared and disappeared from view following one death; accidents infrequent but not irrelevant, this was met with more confusion. Her absence however was not long in duration.

While intermittent conversation had prior relevance, it was only after some time that understanding was established.

Although maintaining an ambient ubiety, it is not too infrequent that taking part in matters is a focus.

Unease and misgiving are directed toward her on occasion by other individuals despite occasional involvement, which is not without rationality.

Trivia

Has an interest in flowers and stones.

Her hair appears dyed, although this is uncertain.

May differ in clothing but does not often attempt relevancies. It can be assumed that the clothing is of the same basis, and articles may disappear as soon as she does.

Does not talk very often, silence typical unless prompted.

Appears to have a concise personality and interests.

Not apparent to most, although it is uncertain if this may differ.

Often vanishes if remaining out of sight for long durations, reappearing elsewhere eventually within the relative terrain.

Items carried along may follow with her after a disappearance, or may remain otherwise. When an item remains, it typically is left on the ground idly.

Appears to know when an individual nearby is in danger or at risk of abrupt harm. May pause and watch the other individual until the risk passes, whether fortunately or with detriment.

If a situation is worse than what would be ideal, her direct behaviour may visibly indicate what will occur. This includes clutching her throat, chest, or other locative.

More severely, blood and related substances may on occasion occur around the impending wound.

Who is being imitated is unclear, if anyone.

In not having changed appearance thus far, it can be assumed that the person in question is either alive or deceased.

Appears somewhat indistinct if looked at indirectly. This gains as a factor the more a person looks away. At a minimal degree of perception, an uncertain shape may be evident instead of her usual visage.

Appears to not eat or drink, despite showing remote interest in food and liquids. Breathing appears relevant, despite the sound of air being absent.

Does not tire easily evidently, despite retaining the physical capacity of her appearance.

Injury has had occasional relevance through accidents or when encountering different phenomenon during routes. This has not appeared to impair capability. It is uncertain whether pain is relevant or even possible.

Regardless, offers to help after an encounter with relevant factors have been typically met with silence or direct refusal.

Any sort of harm to her person does not appear to last indefinitely. Minimal to severe factors revert upon disappearance and reappearance when her person is left out of sight for too long.

Appears to remember and indirectly reference occurrences where injury occurred but does not show fear concerning related events.

By extent of awareness, she is often the first to know if something might happen. Her appearances are often considered with gravity by others.

Has vanished upon being injured on occasion prior, then leaving behind a stuffed animal in her place. Reappearing at another location followed at a varying duration, if not having evidently continued forward down a nearby path immediately or shortly after related complication.

She does not appear to be against acting a watch, having been spoken with about relevant matters. Consistently, she has led one or more persons to a location where something might happen, or has already happened. In each infrequent case, this is not without error.

If the former situation becomes accurate, one or more persons often attempt and succeed at eliminating an augured threat. If the latter case instead is accurate, the remains are left for other parties to consider.

Being nondescript, 'she' blends into crowds easily. It might be fair to say multiple others exist or have existed in areas of activity. Accidents draw focus.

It is further uncertain why 'she' has chosen this particular location to remain around, but with occasional incidents, it is not unreasonable.