There is an overall even distribution of wealth.

Most are capable of supporting themselves monetarily. Although the quantity of currency can differ between individuals based on heritage, if not active opportunity, the level of poverty present within populaces is low.

Local systems exist that are designed to reduce need for basic necessities. Those willing or capable of applying for support are given a groundwork from which to work from on a case by case basis. Unless an individual willfully adheres to a life of asceticism, there is not often a singular reason for privation.

---

Social classes exist but do not entirely determine the amount of influence an individual may have. Although currency does cause differences, there is a relative degree of respect between the lower and upper classes, understanding existent for the most part that no level can exist without the others.

Prior complications in that regard, historically, have fueled relevant understanding, although nothing similar in regard to social divergence has occurred within recent years.

Regardless of this lack of conflict, social awareness is still present concerning necessities on an ambient level. A criterion is typically imposed on employers in response to disadvantages, the welfare of workers seen as important.

On an individual basis, many persons differentiate in their views concerning social structure, and may even alter from present social standing through individual decision.

It is possible for wealth to increase or decrease depending on individual decisions.

In uncommon cases, abandonment of demands that accompany inheritance have been deemed opportune by younger generational figures, which is managed through various means: usually by marrying into a lower family or outright vanishing.

Further, there are cases where families of difference have blended through individual choice, although this typically is not sudden as an occurrence.